Ron Mwangaguhunga: July 2009 Archives

Saving The Congo's Child Soldiers

child_soldier_congo.jpgSean Carasso founded Falling Whistles to bring attention to child soldiers in the war in the Democratic Republic of Congo. These innocents have been forced to serve in the North Kivu province. If the children were too small to hold a gun in Africa's longest war, the rebel army made them stand at the front lines as human shields armed only with a whistle. In an interview with Intent, Carasso told of his encounter with this level of cruelty:


I'd heard that the biggest war in the world is in Congo. I really didn't know any details, and knew that if that was the case -- if the biggest war in the world is happening and I didn't know anything about it, that was a problem in and of itself. I needed to go learn. So the idea was to go in for a five-day exploratory trip to start learning, asking questions, get as good of an understanding as I could in a few days and make some contacts so I could stay in touch. And at the end of those five days, we ended up discovering this illegal prison for kids. It was basically a military prison .. That day, the "Falling Whistles day," was in a moment of total and complete vulnerability. One of those moments when everything stops and it's like, "OK, this we have to do something about." I haven't really gotten to a place to where I can explain it. My ambitions, my desires, my dreams -- all went away.


Sean took this trip to the Congo after visiting South Africa with his friend Blake Mycoskie of TOMS Shoes, who was there to provide footwear for children in need. Sean exposed the military prison to the U.N. and it was subsequently shut down. Sean blogged about the event, forwarding it to family and friends and they in turn forwarded it as well. Several generations of forwarding later, tens of thousands of people had read the post and a movement was soon born.


When he returned home, Sean's friend Marcus, a street artist, gave him a whistle as a symbolic gesture to keep the story alive. "So we started selling whistles and generating funds to eventually send to our friends in Congo who are doing really great work, locals, whose goal is to create whistleblowers out of their generation as well in Congo."


You can purchase a whistle necklace to help child soldiers in the Congo here. And learn more about the cause here.


[Image: Odi.org]

Should Sarah Palin Start A Third Party?

sarah_palin_2.jpgThere was some serious talk that Sarah Palin might form a third party after she left the governorship of Alaska. The argument goes that while the elites of the Republican Party -- Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, William Kristol -- have all but dismissed her, Palin still has significant support within middle America. There is, of course, a strong tradition of "outsider" third party political candidates storming the heartland, attacking the eggheads -- from Millard Fillmore to Theodore Roosevelt to Palin supporter Pat Buchanan.


There are benefits to a Sarah Palin third party. If Palin were to run as a "Know Nothing" candidate, she would probably purify the Republican party of political toxins such as fringe groups like the "Birthers" and, we cannot fail to note, the outright sour tea-partying racists. The AM talk radio crowd and all that. Such an event would allow the Republican party to evolve into something more 21st century, multicultural-friendly without the dead weight of the past. The Democrat and Republican Parties could then conceivably have a grown-up conversation about the direction of the country without the knuckleheads in tow. The Republicans would probably veer towards sounding more like the consensus-building David Cameron of the UK (accelerating a perhaps inevitable party trend). Finally, a Sarah Palin-led third party would probably garner about as many votes as George Wallace, who in 1968 received less than 10 million. Significant, yes, but that run is essentially relegated to the dustbin of history.


In many ways the Palinites, the Birthers and the anti-Obama-at-all-costs crowd are more dangerous exerting their influence within the Republican Party.


[Image: LAProgressive]

Who Killed Natalia Estemirova?


Human rights advocate and Russian journalist Natalia Estemirova was murdered almost two weeks ago under mysterious circumstances. Her fearless criticism of the prosecution of the Chechnyan wars is believed to have something to do with her disappearance and tragic death. Fellow human rights lawyer Stanislav Markelov and journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who had spent the last days of their respective earthly existences critically examining the the Kremlin and its policy toward Chechnya, both died under similarly mysterious circumstances. Coincidence? From The Economist:


It was the kind of scene she had described many times. On July 15th at 8.30am, as she left her flat in Grozny, Natalia Estemirova was forced into a white Lada. She shouted that she was being kidnapped, but those who heard were too scared to report it. By the time her colleagues had found out, she was dead, murdered by three bullets in her chest and a control shot in the head.


There was a mark from a man's hand on her shoulder, where she was grabbed, and a bruise on her face, where she had been hit. Her wrists bore the marks of bindings. Ramzan Kadyrov, the authoritarian Chechen president, considered her an enemy. And she died as one. She documented hundreds of similar cases in Chechnya, supplying witness statements and photographs, forcing prosecutors to investigate and the media to write about kidnappings, torture and killings, often conducted by people in official uniforms. Much of what the world knew about Chechnya came from her and her colleagues at Memorial, a heroic group which started by documenting Stalinist crimes but continued to trace their modern-day consequences, especially in the Caucasus.


Her murder made few headlines in Russia, which has long been deaf to her findings or deaths such as hers.


We will not be silent. It seems sadly inevitable in retrospect that against the repugnant thuggishness of the Chechnyan wars the earnest call for humanitarianism by Ms. Estemirova and people like her would be met, continually, with gunfire, then -- even more resoundingly -- with silence. Has the West lost its will to stand up to Russia on a non-essential issue like a breakaway republic in the face of nuclear proliferation? Chechnya is clearly not as sexy as "Jon & Kate Plus 8." But it is by the courage of her convictions and the purity of her ideals, however, that we remember Natalia Estemirova as a committed journalist and advocate for human rights. Estemirova was 51 and leaves behind a 15-year-old daughter. May she rest in peace.

Is Rwanda Africa's Success Story?

Paul Kagame [PDF], Rwanda's pro-business President, is in the midst of a political renaissance. Fifteen years after the Rwandan genocide, the tiny African nation had 11.2% growth last year, up from 6% in 2007. And Rwanda -- along with Botswana and Ghana -- is often mentioned as a superlative examples of African success. Curiously, Kagame embraces Dambisa Moyo's increasingly influential thesis that Africa no longer needs aid (he is influenced, to be sure, by the West's ambivalence at that sanguinary genocide). Emmy nominated Fareed Zakaria asks hard questions of President Kagame this week on CNN's GPS.


Who Should Win The Emmy For Lead Actress In Drama?


This year's Emmy race for lead actress in a drama is particularly rich and the nominees will be revealed (finally) on Thursday, July 16. Women, IMHO, are better actors than men. The Best Actress Oscar is, for me, always more competitive than Best Actor. Television more often than not offers meatier roles for women, particularly women over the age of 40 (who experience ageism, unfortunately, in the movie business. This year there are plenty of seasoned women, young women and women of color in the running. My choices for the best actresses on television this year are: Glenn Close, Sally Field, Anna Paquin, Regina King, Jill Scott and Elizabeth Moss. Who should win the Emmy for lead actress In Drama? If I forgot anyone, please feel free to place your choice in the comments section so we can discuss.

Exclusive: Crashing The Madoff Verdict

0312_madoff.jpg

Irrepressible media personality Ivy Supersonic -- nee Ivy Silberstein -- crashed the Bernie Madoff verdict by sneaking in through a side stairway. I don't condone that act (which is illegal), but she felt strongly about the pain Madoff caused to so many people and wanted to be there to see his face as the verdict was read, consequences be damned. Ivy, for the record, has a heart as big as her impulsiveness. She also happened to tape the incident -- also illegal -- before her recording device was confiscated. The whole sordid story is recounted here on my blog. Here's an excerpt from her text message on how the recording device was found out:


At 11am I was famished and weak I nodded out for a brief second from exaction hunger and boredom while madoff lawyer spoke he Was unconvincing and dull..is the word droll?? I would think there would b a pitbull in the room not roosters Ladybodycourtguard said "shut off ur phone." I am mechanical boob I couldn't shut off ...


That's where her cell -- originally gifted to Robin Quivers of the Howard Stern show -- was confiscated. District Judge Denny Chin issued a summons on the spot. In the court documents Judge Chin wrote: "The FPS shall make a copy of the recording before the recording is deleted from Ms. Silberstein's device, and the FPS shall retain the recording in the event Ms. Silberstein wants to assert any rights thereto, in which case further proceedings will be required." Ivy texted me a couple of days ago saying that she was strongly considering mounting a legal challenge for the tape, adding, "If I was (Judge Chin) I'd release it to the entire world." You can't keep a good woman down.


[Image: BusinessWeek]

The Rights Of Women In Morocco


CNN's "Inside Africa" is one of the best shows on television for getting a peek into the inner lives of sub-Saharan Africans who often live in repressive, closed regimes. Recently, the program has focused on Morocco and the effects of the 2004 Moroccan Family Law (Moudawana). After a 20-year battle women's groups in Morocco brilliantly persuaded King Mohammed VI to enact some of the most progressive family legislation in the Arab world. Although the law is not perfect, and there are reports of men circumventing it, the effects on the lives of Moroccan women have been incredible. For example: the minimum age for marriage is now 18 (up from 15). Also: Marriage now has to be certified by a judge, making it more difficult for men to simply abandon their wives. Could this be the model for the empowerment of women throughout the Muslim world?

What's Eating Dambisa Moyo?


Dambisa Moyo has a point. The way in which she makes her point, however, rankles. The Zambian-born economist and author of Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa has stirred up controversy by attacking the chic celebritification of Africa.


Moyo can only be properly described as the classic Type A personality. With degrees from Harvard and Oxford and time served at Goldman Sachs, Moyo is an almost unnaturally driven advocate of the pull-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps approach. Unfortunately -- or, perhaps, fortunately -- Moyo holds everyone to the same standards in which she runs her life. Many Sub-Saharan governments lean, almost grotesquely, on the crutch of short-term foreign aid to provide for the people, overlooking, in the process, long-term bets like investing in education of the young and infrastructural spending. Of course, that hard rhetoric dovetails perfectly into the Steve Forbes crowd (Africanophile Forbes smarmily blurbed her book). The result: Forbes magazine -- which could care less about African advancement -- and Moyo are on the same side of the aisle, speaking in the same voice.


Dambisa Moyo's argument ought to be heard. For too long -- decades, in fact -- the other side has dominated, and the results have been thin considering the vast amounts of moneies from Europe and America. "With aid-based models," she said on Fareed Zakaria's "GPS" this week, "you will never get a situation where governments provide innovative solutions to problems." Clearly the ultra-capitalistic tough love approach has worked for the particular temperament of Moyo, but -- and this is the $64,000 question -- Would it work for Sub-Saharan Africa? Can we take that risk? Can we not?

Uganda's First Baby Rhino In Decades!


I was born in Uganda years ago (I won't say how many). The country has been through a lot. My family emigrated to the United States as Idi Amin's bloodthirsty regime imploded in the late '70s. There was civil war afterwards. Hundreds of thousands of Ugandans died as a result. Since 1986, however, President Museveni has brought peace and stability as well as relatively democratic multiparty elections. The press is free. And during the 1990s, per capita income growth averaged 3.2 for the decade (6.9% per annum). Good times.


Although I am not a superstitious person by nature, I take it as a good omen that the first rhino calf was born in Uganda in two decades. The value of rhinoceros horns caused poachers -- unchecked during the civil wars -- to run wild, decimating, in the process, the native population of that majestic animal. The present Ugandan rhino population -- six -- is a sign that things are looking perhaps up for "the pearl of Africa." They have not been able to determine the sex of the calf as of yet. "The calf is three days old, but the mother is too protective. So, it is difficult to get close to them to establish its gender," Angie Genade, the executive director of Rhino Fund Uganda told NewVision.co.uk. Word is that it will be named Barack if it is a male and Michelle if it is a female. How's that for good old American soft power?

A Marijuana Tax?


The ominous unemployment numbers of the June jobs report have policy wonks wondering if a second stimulus package might be needed. California is issuing IOUs. Unemployment in once mighty Michigan, formerly an engine of American economic growth, has topped 14 percent. New York is reeling from the collapse of the financial industry (to the tune of $3.5 billion in lost tax revenues). State government tax revenues across the country are, to put it lightly, in dire peril.


It seems that now is the perfect time to discuss the matter of a marijuana tax. Marijuana could be the perfect new revenue stream for evaporating state budgets. As unemployment rises -- and President Obama predicts it to pass 10 percent this year -- so tax revenues decrease. It is no accident that the pragmatic Arnold Schwarzenegger, governor of embattled California, has started that ball rolling in that direction. The question came up at President Obama's virtual town meeting. Marijuana legalization advocates voted to push the matter to the top of the charts over such sections as "financial stability," "jobs" and "budget." Ironically, there may be a correlation between these three categories. Why not add "green jobs" in for good measure and we'll call it even?


In response to the president's brushing off of the issue of marijuana, Jack Cole, executive director of the Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, replied, "It would be an enormous economic stimulus if we stopped wasting so much money arresting and locking people up for nonviolent drug offenses and instead brought new tax revenue from legal sales." Plus, the legalization of marijuana would free up jail space (and the cost of housing prisoners) better served for violent criminals. Also, legalizing and taxing marijuana would disempower the drug cartels with which we are at war. Finally, municipalities from sea to shining sea need a fresh infusion of cash as the great recession marches on. Can America continue to be so prudish about the issue when a potentially massive revenue source lies before us in this fiscal hour of the wolf?

How About That Economy?


According to the latest figures, unemployment is at 9.5%. 614,000 more people applied for unemployment insurance benefits just last week. And India just joined Russia and China in questioning the dollar as the major reserve currency. How about that economy, Jon Stewart? Make us laugh. We dare you.

Kristof, Colbert And Endocrine Disruptors

Nicholas Kristof -- who does the lord's work -- was on Stephen Colbert this week talking about his Sunday column on endocrine disruptors and their impact on water animals and humans. "We don't know for sure that these chemicals are harmful," Kristof writes in a follow-up. "But the evidence is mounting."


Kristof got interested in the issue after watching Hedrick Smith's Frontline special, "Poisoned Waters." He wonders if today's frog deformities from agricultural chemicals is somehow linked to the explosion of cases of hypospadia in human beings. The key is endocrine-disrupting chemicals, or EDCs. Phthalates, used in plastics, are significant endocrine disruptors and there may be a connection with hypospadias. These are questions have have to be asked with great seriousness. If anyone can find humor in this grim issue, it is Stephen Colbert, who also, in his own fashion, does the lord's work with levity.


What About Gay Marriage?

love%20is%20not%20about%20gender.jpgNo one said this was going to be easy, but we must keep our eyes on the prize. The gay marriage issue, which seemed so close only a month ago, is now caught up in the maelstrom that is Albany politics. "I had hoped today's march would have been a bit of a wedding march. It's not," Christine Quinn, the gay speaker of the New York City Council, told Reuters at Sunday's Gay Pride parade in Manhattan.


Some are saying that in the thick of Albany's meltdown, gay marriage in New York might have to wait. Although 42 U.S. states explicitly prohibit gay marriage, Congressman Barney Frank recently predicted that within five years thirty states will have legal civil ceremonies. Frank included New York in his prediction. Gay couples presently can marry in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Iowa and they can marry in New Hampshire in January and in Vermont starting in September, just in time for lovely foliage season. In the last week pressure has been exerted against the President from his progressive base regarding the languid pace of his campaign promises to the gay community. And Obama's listening.


There is reason to be optimistic on gay marriage, even as the New York State Senate dithers. May's Quinnipiac poll showed that the demographics are on the side of gay marriage activists. Survey participants aged 18-34 backed same-sex marriage by a 61-33 margin. Participants 35-54 support it by a 48-44 margin. It was voters 55 and older that oppose gay marriage, 55-37. What does this tell us? "Young people are for this," Quinnipiac University Polling Director Mickey Carroll said. "If the gay advocacy groups are patient, they're going to win." No one said it was going to be easy.


[Image: Monkfish-Abbey.org]

Has Facebook Jumped The Shark?


Has Facebook jumped the shark? Most people I know use Facebook dramatically less than they did a year ago. I haven't been on in about a week. But if I am off Twitter for more than a day I suffer acute Tweet withdrawal. Is Facebook going the way of MySpace?


When the Iranian protests exploded it was Twitter's moment. Yes, there were Facebook accounts registering protest. But the 140-character nature of Tweets was the perfect medium for protesters to place busts of information, for watchers to post notes of solidarity and for serious link love. It didn't help that cable news inexplicably took the weekend off, delivering canned programming as Tehran burned. Clearly Twitter is at the zenith of its influence, but does that entail that Facebook is in decline? P.S. You can follow us at @awearnessblog.