
So far in the New Depression, declining Detroit automakers and a mythical high-speed intercity rail network have both received billions of dollars in federal stimulus funds. According to the
American Public Transit Association, buses, streetcars, subways, elevateds, and commuter trains run by U.S. public transit operators provided 10.2 billion trips in 2007, the latest year for which annual data is available. That number is no doubt higher now that many cash-strapped Americans are relying on transit as a cost-cutting measure. So why are so many of our nation's transit providers cutting back service this year?
The answer is multifold, but not surprising. Sales and gas-tax revenues, which historically have funded bus and rail transit service in many American cities,
have plummeted in the past two years along with the economy. Most transit providers are finding it hard to maintain existing service, much less provide additional service for new riders seeking a break from the cost of car ownership.
Making matters worse, beginning in the 1990s, the
federal government stopped providing operational funding for transit in cities with populations greater than 200,000. And lest you be fooled by the billions of transit-aimed stimulus monies that actually
have filtered down around the country, they're all for capital projects, allowing transit agencies to buy vehicles and build stations that they
can't necessarily afford to operate.
Further, there's no clear national leadership to push for stimulus funds for public transit the way there was for high-speed rail. The reason for that is equally obvious: speedy, shiny, new-fangled, Euro-styled bullet trains are a lot sexier -- and much easier for politicians to point to as proof of progress -- than old, reliable, inner-city transit service.
Because no one's come to bat for public transit so far, in 2010 most major American cities stand to lose significant amounts of bus and rail service, leaving carless citizens stranded, worsening traffic congestion, and making it harder for people to get to work. Cutbacks are already under way. This month,
Chicago lost almost 20% of bus service and 10% of 'L' train service. New York City has just approved its
deepest transit cuts since the 1980s. Other areas with transit service potentially on the chopping block this year include
Cleveland,
New Jersey (statewide),
Philadelphia,
Portland (Oregon),
San Diego,
San Francisco,
San Jose, and
Washington D.C., among others. (As if that list of proposed cutbacks isn't long enough, see this
T4America Google Maps mashup for many more.)
I'd offer some hope in this ongoing story of urban-mobility bloodletting if I could see any on the horizon. But another dry
APTA legislative conference is likely not the answer. An emotional call-to-arms for American transit-riding voters asking their Congressional representatives to save their communal rides would be a much better idea. I wish we had a national leader willing to fight that battle. But that wish and $2.25 will get me my next ride on the Chicago 'L'.
As long as it's still running, anyway.