The Union's in a State, Alright

Veronica did a great job last week of recapping President Obama's Sate of the Union address. Read her post for an astute analysis of what Obama said, some provocative questions about what the future may hold, and a call to action; you'll be glad you did. But if you're pressed for time, here is the political cartoonist Ed Stein's take:


Stei100126-600x405.gif


I've said it before, and I'll say it again: I don't blame Obama for most of the problems we're facing right now. I blame the junky machinery of the U.S. Government, which may be the most inefficient organization ever formed. Maybe Obama should give an address about that. I'm sure he'd love to, but then he'd get voted out of office. Ain't that the rub?


[Image: InDenverTimes.com. See more of Stein's work at EdSteinInk.com]

Leaving Afghanistan... Someday?

It must be very hard to be Barack Obama. He's constantly being pressed for definitive answers, resolute plans, and swift follow-through. But rarely can he deliver on all three, as we've seen in the past year, and it's no fault of his own.


The political apparatus is forever getting clogged with Senatorial bickering, Supreme Court legislations, public dissent, and an endless list of other obstacles that make Obama the idealist look more like Obama the deceiver.


Take a look at how General Patraeus tries to move the goal posts set by the president just a few months ago, when he said that we would be out of Afghanistan by July of 2011. Again, I am sympathetic to Obama here: He may have had every reason to believe this would be possible when he set that date. If the date gets pushed back, which it surely will, I blame the junky machinery of Washington D.C. Unfortunately, it'll be Obama who ends up taking the blame.


No Dragons, Just the Dungeon

120px-Dungeons_and_Dragons_game.jpgFor decades, role-playing games have been an outlet for kids and young adults who for whatever reason crave an alternate reality, in which their acne or their social awkwardness won't prevent them from conquering monsters, courting princesses, or battling a well-matched enemy with mallets and cannonballs.


Such fantasies are harmless, though some have argued that they can blur the line between reality and fantasy to the point where players might actually hurt themselves, not just their avatars. Throughout the 1970s and 80s, anxiety ran high over the rising popularity of role playing games, namely Dungeons & Dragons.


That game is now the subject of a dispute in a Wisconsin prison, where an inmate and lifelong D&D enthusiast has been denied access to the game on the grounds that it might inspire escape fantasies.


I've never been incarcerated, but I have been in plenty of places that I don't want to be, and I have never needed any help in fantasizing about escape. That's what people do when they're stuck someplace they desperately want to get out of. Whether or not they follow through is another matter, but I have a very hard time understanding how limiting a prisoner's gaming privileges will curb their desire to get out of prison.


You can imprison a person's body, but their mind is theirs alone. Unless, that is, prisons impose control on a person's psychic reality as well as their physical one, which measures like this threaten to do.


What's next? Banning books, pens, card games, and anything else that might provide a brief mental reprieve from the drudgery of prison life?


Anthony Burgess's novel about a dystopian future and its draconian prison system, A Clockwork Orange, predicted precisely such control over inmates' minds when it was written almost 50 years ago. Somehow I doubt that Burgess would be proud of his prescience.


[Image: Chicago Sun Times]

The State of Our Union is Up to Us


I've heard it been said that a great leader leads but also gets others to do some leading. During the State of the Union address last night, President Obama, I hope, made it clear that if we are going to get this country back on track, it is going to take all of us.


He took the Republicans to task for being obstructionist on most bills in the Congress. "Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership." But also reminded the Democrats to use their majority: "I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve problems, not run for the hills." He also took blame for not selling the health insurance reform bill better to the American people.


President Obama proposed a lot of things, some progressive like a cap on student loan repayments and forgiveness after 20 years (which I have no idea how that would be paid) but also some not so much like new offshore drilling (Drill, Baby, Drill?).


Even the most progressive ideas sometimes are implemented in a way that doesn't fulfill the intent. Top universities are giving more aid to wealthier families. Mortgage modifications aren't addressing the fact that homes are underwater and include balloon payments.


And that is where we come in.


I truly believe that President Obama has a progressive streak, but that is all it is, a streak. He also has conservative bend. President Obama said that the Congress and he were voted in to serve the people and the people need to remind them all of what we want. We need to remind them of what that is by pushing them on health care, education funding, jobs and anything else we hold dear.


Do we really want failing schools to be closed and communities disrupted in order to ship students around like cogs in some machine?


Will we really read the earmarks online before the vote in order to voice our opinion?


Will "Don't Ask Don't Tell" really be repealed?


One year after the Lily Ledbetter Act, will we finally push the Senate to pass its partner bill, the Paycheck Fairness Act?


Which way will you push them?

Don't Feed the Hungry Children

Andre_Bauer.jpgThat's the advice of South Carolina's Lt. Governor, Andre Bauer, who recently likened hungry children to stray animals in a speech about people on government assistance.


"My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals," Mr. Bauer said at a town hall meeting last week in Fountain Inn, South Carolina. "You know why? Because they breed. You're facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don't think too much further than that. And so what you've got to do is you've got to curtail that type of behavior. They don't know any better."


Bauer's gaffe makes fellow South Carolinan Joe Wilson's "You lie!" exclamation at Barack Obama, during one of the president's speeches about health care, sound like a Hallmark greeting card. The ignorance spewing from Bauer's mouth in this speech is stupefying. The murmurs of agreement from his audience are downright scary.


Mr. Bauer, you say that political correctness is killing our country. I say that meal assistance programs in America's schools are intended to fill the bellies of kids whose families have too little money to do so themselves. Life isn't fair, but this is one of the few ways that the United States can level the playing field, at least a little, in hopes of giving all children the opportunity to succeed.


What's worse? Bauer is vying for the Republican gubernatorial nomination, and this speech was part of his campaign. Oh, sweet jiminy.


[Image: Wikipedia]

Will Howard Stern Return To Terrestrial Radio?

HowardStern2000.jpg


It seems to me that one of the most interesting and relevant free speech issues is whether or not satellite radio flourishes. Everything, at present, conspires against its continued success. The auto industry -- a cash center for satellite radios -- is in deep turmoil. And paying for radio in this Great Recession economy is a luxury that not too many can afford. Still, satellite radio is a marvelous medium in which nearly anything goes. You'll remember, of course, that shock jock Howard Stern jackrabbited there from the now moribund terrestrial radio medium after Viacom's Sumner Redstone failed to defend him from the slings and arrows of the overly censorious FCC at the height of the Bush administration.


But that was then, this is now. Currently, satellite radio's biggest draw -- whether you love or hate his potty mouth -- is the libertine libertarian Howard Stern. But Stern's contract expires at the end of 2010, which has led to a lot of speculation among the chattering classes. Whatever decision Howard Stern reaches, he would probably not be getting $80 million a year. From Bloomberg's BusinessWeek:


Sirius XM, which averted bankruptcy last year after John Malone's Liberty Media Corp. bought a 40% stake in exchange for $530 million in loans, may not be able to afford to renew the radio talk-show host's existing contract, worth $500 million, said Tuna Amobi, an analyst at Standard & Poor's. "Even if (a new contract) were half of what it was before, it would still be a major financial burden for Sirius," Amobi says. "It's a totally different game."


For realsies! Stern is now in the early stages of contract negotiations. I do not envy Sirius-XM CEO Mel Karmazin, who is going to have one hell of a time navigating Stern's impending free agent status. Howard doesn't strike me as the type of guy who relishes a pay cut. There has already been some high profile courting from terrestrial radio, to which he might return. "We would be the most logical company for him to optimize his exposure and financial return," Clear Channel CEO John Hogan told Bloomberg's BusinessWeek. "We clearly have both the willingness and the financial wherewithal to consider high-profile talent."


If Stern were to bolt back to terrestrial radio, could satellite radio survive in his absence? Howard brought with him more than seven million listeners/subscribers/hard core fans to the new medium -- how many would stay? How many of those loyalists have been impressed enough with satellite radio that they would pay the subscription fees -- or, possibly, a la carte -- sans Howard Stern. Would enough stay that Sirius-XM could remain not only profitable, but the interesting experiment in the outer limits of free speech that it is right now?


[Image: Wikimedia Commons]

Farewell, Air America Radio


Last week was a bad week for Progressives. There was Scott Brown taking the Ted Kennedy seat in the United States Senate. That hideous Supreme Court ruling allowing corporations to spend ungodly sums in political races. And there was news that Air America Radio was collapsing.


I've been a writer for Air America's blog since September. The blog went dark last Thursday, without links to older stories. This week the radio station will follow suit, evaporating into the ethers. It is a sad occasion, to be sure. I was not a frequent listener to the station, nor did I always go as far as my fellow online writers went politically (I did not, for example, wholly abandon the President for his compromises on the health care bill). But, with the plethora of right-wing thought on the radio -- a medium frequented by the working class, the poor and the over-60 demographic -- it was good to have Air America radio as a progressive counterbalance. Alas, no more.


Air America radio, RIP.

January's Notable Deaths

I didn't plan to write a wrap-up of January's notable deaths, but when each time I heard of one of these deaths, I thought, "Oh, a good idea for AWEARNESS!" And before I could get to my computer, another one happened. I'm sure I missed some, but leave them in the comments.


Trendsetter
Ebony Fashion Fair Producer and Director Eunice W. Johnson. She was the widow of Johnson Publishing Company founder John H. Johnson, gave Ebony magazine its name and was also the driving force behind the creation of the Fashion Fair makeup line, one of the first makeup lines for women of color. [NPR]


Entertainers
Art Clokey, the creator of Gumby and Pokey, and "Davey and Goliath." Clokey modeled his most famous character, Gumby, after his father, Arthur Farrington, who died in a car accident when Art was 9. [Boston.com]


Soul singer Teddy Pendergrass, who was paralyzed in 1982, a moment in history I remember intensely as my aunts use to play his music and talk about him all the time. He died of a protracted illness that followed a diagnosis of colon cancer last year. [Philly.com]


Enrich Segal, author of the iconic 1970s book and film Love Story. According to The New York Times, Erich Segal, who had suffered with Parkinson's disease for 25 years, died of a heart attack at home in London.[January Magazine]


Robert Parker, creator of "Spencer for Hire." Beginning with "The Gudwulf Manuscript" in 1973 and running through 2009's "The Professional," the Spencer series included almost 40 books. But don't fret, two more books are forthcoming. [LA Times]


Foodies
Glen W. Bell Jr. named our favorite fast food taco place after himself: Taco Bell. He had failed to break into the hamburger business, but found his love of Mexican food rewarded him. [NYTimes]


Al Bernardin, former dean of McDonald's Hamburger University (the fast-food chain's training center) and inventor of the legendary Quarter Pounder. He was instrumental in the birth of the company's Filet-o-Fish sandwich, french fries and hot apple and cherry pies as well. [SlashFood]


Donald Goerke, creator of SpaghettiOs. More than 150 million cans of SpaghettiOs are sold each year. Mr. Goerke also created the company's Chunky soup line.[NYTimes]


Considering the variety in these deaths, any tribute would be hard to pull off. At least it would have an excellent soundtrack, a buffet of food and a barrel of laughs and tears.


(Note: I wrote separately about Mary Daly, who died in January, and the late December passings of Brittany Murphy and Vic Chesnutt were also covered on the blog.)

What of the Brangelina Brood?

joliepitt_family.jpgRumor has it that the king and queen of celebrity romance are splitting, and the pop-culture blogosphere is all atwitter about their demise as a couple. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie have been together for five years, having met while working on Mr. and Mrs. Smith in 2004, and though they never married (Jolie vowed not to take vows until gays were given the same right), the two have become parents to six children.


It's those children -- three biological, three adopted -- that aren't getting much attention from the press, which has instead focused on when the relationship began to sour, previous signs of its failing, and how much money the couple is worth.


In decades past, the effect of such a split on such a large brood -- and even one child -- would have been a hotter topic, as concern over the children's welfare might have eclipsed silly details like Brad Pitt's conspicuous absence at the Golden Globes last Sunday. And this might be a positive sign.


A long-standing concern about splitting couples is that their kids will be damaged as a result of the failed relationship. They'll be unbalanced, distrustful, racked with fears of abandonment, neurotic, prone to acting out. And two-parent households are considered inherently better than those with just a mom or dad to rule the nest.


But new research suggests the opposite is true. If the couple is unhappy, that unhappiness could be transferred to the children in even more damaging ways. And contrary to what many have held as an absolute truth for decades, that two-parent households are the best environment for child-rearing, some experts are claiming that all a kid really needs is stability. Since stability can be found in a single-parent home just as easily (and sometimes more easily) than one with both a mom and a dad, the argument that parents should stay together for their children is losing steam.


Someone close to me is currently going through the same thing as Brangelina, though on a smaller scale. There's no media shining a light on his domestic strife, unfolding in America's heartland, and there is just one child in the picture. But that one-year-old girl is the greatest concern in this divorce, and the baby's father takes great comfort in knowing that his daughter will not necessarily be doomed to dysfunction just because he and the baby's mother have come to realize that they're not right for one another.


I hope that more couples come to recognize when it's time to split, and follow through. Staying together for the kids might sound nice, but if being together means creating a domestic hell for them to grow up in, it may cause more harm than good.


[Image: Celebrities.GearLive.com]

Get With the Program: One on One With Hillary Clinton

HillaryClinton One Year Later.jpgNow that the Obama Administration has completed its first year in office, it's time to take a step back and review how the first 12 months have gone for some of the leading figures of the Obama team. Just how has Hillary Clinton performed in her first year as Secretary of State? In a one-hour special feature for PBS, Tavis Smiley, host of TAVIS SMILEY REPORTS, takes a closer look at Hillary's first year in office:

"In the first of four primetime specials that examine some of the country's defining moments, noted broadcaster Tavis Smiley accompanies Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on a diplomatic mission abroad, to meetings on Capitol Hill and within the State Department itself, to give the American public a candid and incisive view of the inner workings of U.S. diplomacy and international relations."

The one-hour program airs on PBS on Wednesday, January 27, from 8:00 - 9:00 pm EST.


[image: One on One With Hillary Clinton courtesy of Tavis Smiley Reports]