Should Sarah Palin Start A Third Party?

sarah_palin_2.jpgThere was some serious talk that Sarah Palin might form a third party after she left the governorship of Alaska. The argument goes that while the elites of the Republican Party -- Peggy Noonan, David Brooks, William Kristol -- have all but dismissed her, Palin still has significant support within middle America. There is, of course, a strong tradition of "outsider" third party political candidates storming the heartland, attacking the eggheads -- from Millard Fillmore to Theodore Roosevelt to Palin supporter Pat Buchanan.


There are benefits to a Sarah Palin third party. If Palin were to run as a "Know Nothing" candidate, she would probably purify the Republican party of political toxins such as fringe groups like the "Birthers" and, we cannot fail to note, the outright sour tea-partying racists. The AM talk radio crowd and all that. Such an event would allow the Republican party to evolve into something more 21st century, multicultural-friendly without the dead weight of the past. The Democrat and Republican Parties could then conceivably have a grown-up conversation about the direction of the country without the knuckleheads in tow. The Republicans would probably veer towards sounding more like the consensus-building David Cameron of the UK (accelerating a perhaps inevitable party trend). Finally, a Sarah Palin-led third party would probably garner about as many votes as George Wallace, who in 1968 received less than 10 million. Significant, yes, but that run is essentially relegated to the dustbin of history.


In many ways the Palinites, the Birthers and the anti-Obama-at-all-costs crowd are more dangerous exerting their influence within the Republican Party.


[Image: LAProgressive]

Comments (3)

I know some Republicans who would agree with you. There's nothing wrong with being a Republican, but I'd argue that the people you mention aren't even Republicans themselves. They're some aberration of the category, and all of the intelligent Republicans I know voted Democrat this year out of embarrassment over what their party had become.


Haha. It was intelligent to vote for the Obama "circus"(insult to clowns everywhere)?? That might be the dumbest thing I've heard on this site yet. Obama is a failure.

If you watch television you’ve seen the ads: “So bring in that old jalopy and get up to $4500 towards the purchase of a new or select used vehicle. That’s right get up to $4500 for that old piece of junk, plus you keep the rebates. You have to hurry! Since funds are limited for this program it’s first come first served!” Well we’re about to find out just how limited those funds were. The Obama administration’s cash-for-clunkers program has been such a “success” that in just the first week of full implementation, the $1 billion originally allocated for the program is about to be exhausted already. Does this mean the program is over? We don’t know. Nobody does. And that is just the beginning of why this program is a perfect illustration of why Obamanomics will fail.


Anonymous: I'm tackling the "Cash for Clunkers" program on this site later in the week (and my colleague Veronica tackled it earlier).

David Alm: You may be right. All of the intelligent Republicans I know -- even the conservatives and not just the moderates -- voted Obama. I assumed that this new category -- Tea parties, Obama-is-a-Secret-Muslim types -- voted McCain, or are registered Republicans or hard core Reagan Democrats or Dixiecrats or what have you. But the more I see the Birthers, the Glenn Becks .. I just don't know. They seem to be the disaffected fringe that occupy the outer limits of Hoftsader's essay on the paranoid style of American politics.

Leave a comment