On Friday, the McCain campaign released this attack ad against Barack Obama, in which the Democratic nominee's ties to former Weatherman Bill Ayers is revisited after a nice two-month hiatus from this non-issue.
But you won't think it's a non-issue if you take the ad at face value.
You'll probably think it's serious business, a grave political matter, and a clear indication that Barack Obama is a terrorist himself. Why else would he cavort with someone as unsavory, unAmerican and heartless as Bill Ayers?
Here are a few reasons I can think of without even glancing at the Obama campaign's response to the ad or anything else:
One: Proximity. Although I didn't know them, I was also a neighbor of Bill Ayers, Barack Obama, Reverend Jeremiah Wright and even Louis Farrakhan for that matter -- first as a graduate student, and then as a member of the community. Am I a dangerous person? (I realize you can't answer that, but no, I'm not.)
This was in Hyde Park, on the South Side of Chicago, home to the University of Chicago, where Ayers and Obama both have homes. It's the kind of neighborhood where people bump into each other at the local produce stand, or a bookstore, and wind up chatting for an hour about Lacanian psychoanalysis or political theory.
It's the kind of place where world-famous theologians walk their dogs with people who work in the department where they first split the atom. It's the kind of neighborhood with only one dive bar and one upscale bar.
I once had a few beers at the dive bar with Bill Ayers' adopted son, whose own mother was sent to prison for her involvement with the Weathermen. She asked Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn (who teaches law at Northwestern, by the way), to raise him. Does this make me an accomplice, too?
In short, it's a university town. And in university towns, academics know other academics, especially if they might work in fields that are of interest to one another.
Two: Conversation. Bill Ayers is a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, and education has been among Obama's central issues since he announced his candidacy. Is it so far-fetched to think that when Obama and Ayers did stop for a chat on a leafy sidewalk in Hyde Park -- regardless of how frequently it happened -- they talked of education, not how to blow up another government building?
Three: Professional Respect. Let's think about Ayers for a minute. His talents and dedication to his profession were enough to get him a job teaching future educators at a school renowned for its education program. He is taken seriously in this role, and his integrity hasn't been an issue for 30 years. Sounds like someone I wouldn't mind having coffee with now and then -- why not Barack Obama?
According to the McCain campaign, Ayers is a dangerous radical, and Obama's association with him, however slight, means Obama has a hidden agenda.
I have a question for the McCain campaign: Shouldn't you also be worried about all the colleagues Ayers has at UIC, his students, his children, and anyone else that's come into contact with him? If you're really worried about Obama's integrity, isn't that just the tip of the iceberg? Aren't you afraid that throughout this country, there may be secret cells of domestic terrorists -- teachers, college administrators, dentists, lawyers and secretaries -- plotting to destroy this country from the inside out?
If you are, then maybe you ought to be launching attacks against them, too, for having known Bill Ayers at some point in their lives. And while you're at it, go after all the people his wife knows, too.
But if you aren't, give the allegations against Obama a rest. Not only are they preposterous, but they suggest that you don't care about all the other people Ayers knows, which frankly undermines your entire attack. Because if associating with him really does make someone a threat, we're already screwed.
Not the Ayers Connection Again...


Check our most impactful articles and see how popular these opinions are with you.
Will others follow in your footsteps? Share your thoughts and ideas for changing the world.



You make valid points David. Note that the current administration, and those associated with it - so McCain and Palin - aren't just worried about all the other people with which Ayers may have had contact... they're petrified. They understand the simple fact that someone doesn't have to be a foreign citizen to qualify as a potential terrorist, so they suspect everybody, including all Americans. The right wing of the Republican party has taken a clear turn towards McCarthyism. I for one do not feel safer with the lenses and microphones of the government pointed inwards. Instead I share their sense of paranoia, and because of the erosion of our fundamental freedoms I feel that it has become dangerous to express how unhealthy, invasive, and counterproductive this all is. I used to be able to rely on the Constitution, but I can no longer rely on this government to uphold it. Thank goodness it now seems inevitable that an expert in Constitutional law will be the next president.
You're right, Decomprose. This is a reprise of McCarthyism -- who knew whom when, and what might that association mean for our national security.
It's not an unfair question to ask, of course, but considering how harmless Ayers has been since he and Bernadine Dohrn turned themselves in three decades ago -- and not only harmless, but a productive and positive influence on society -- I think the attacks against Obama for knowing him are sorely misguided.
The man is not a threat, and Obama, who was eight years old when the Weathermen began their non-violent crusade (they didn't hurt anyone; they always waited until the buildings were empty), shouldn't be held accountable for what they did in the 1970s to protest the Vietnam War.
I also second your point about having an expert on Constitutional law in office. Who cares how long he's been on Capitol Hill -- at least he knows about civil rights.
This has been a particularly interesting meme to follow, especially in how media with right and left leanings have been spinning it. The WSJ's Political Perceptions blog has a round-up.
Thanks, Andrew. That round-up on the WSJ site is helpful in illustrating how polarizing this issue is.
The New York Times today is also full of articles about the Obama/Ayers connection, including several mentions of derisive comments that Sarah Palin has made on the topic.
And yet, no one has discussed the aspects that I want to drive home: the uniqueness of the Hyde Park community, and the all-too-obvious fact that Bill Ayers is an upstanding, productive, respected member of society, whose contacts extend far, far beyond Barack Obama to include countless individuals in all manner of professions.
Why isn't the McCain campaign following them? Because it doesn't care to, obviously. And why not? Because those people don't pose any more threat to the American people than Barack Obama.
It's a shame that this election has sunk to this, but an even greater shame that the operatives behind a presidential campaign can't seem to look beyond the smear potential of a piece of blown-up and fabricated "controversy."