October 2008 Archives

wm1548_chart1.gif


"Socialism" has been bandied about frequently in the late stages of this presidential election as a single-word rebuke of the idea of taxing the rich to pay the poor. The Washington-based Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, however, has released a new report saying that 18 states tax the working poor deeper into poverty. As we move into the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, are regressive taxes the answer?


Last year, the federal poverty line for a family of four was $21,203. More than half of the states in the union actually collected taxes from families of four with incomes just above that poverty line. Unfortunately, provisions designed to protect low-income families from taxation were not increased to keep up with inflation, so some states increased their income taxes on the poor last year. Measures must be put in place to make sure that this doesn't happen again as we move deeper into the financial crisis. From the report, titled "The Impact of State Income Taxes On Low income People in 2007":


Some states levy income tax on working families in severe poverty. Nine states -- Alabama, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Montana, Ohio and West Virginia -- tax the income of two-parent families of four earning less than three-quarters of the poverty line ($15,902). And six states -- Alabama, Hawaii, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, and West Virginia -- tax the income of one-parent families of three earning less than three-quarters of the poverty line ($12,398).


In some states, families living in poverty face income tax bills of several hundred dollars. A two-parent family of four in Alabama with income at the poverty line owes $423 in income tax, while such a family owes $409 in Hawaii, $325 in Oregon, and $258 in West Virginia. Such amounts can make a big difference to a family struggling to escape poverty.


A full PDF of the report is available here.


[Image: Heritage Foundation]

081023004653.jpgUsing cheap computer software, researchers found that showing a person a picture of a political candidate "morphed" with one of the person's own face made the subject more likely to vote for that candidate.


Scheduled for publication this December in Public Opinion Quarterly, the study sets out to disprove the notion that voters make their decisions by rational thought. In fact, the authors suggest, it's often much more superficial. (It should be noted, however, that voters who've already made up their minds are not likely to be swayed by seeing a resemblance, no matter how strong.)


Begun just before the 2004 election, and consisting now of three distinct experiments, the study has relied on subjects being unaware of why their images were being morphed with the candidates'. And to the researchers' knowledge, the software has never actually been used in a real campaign.


But with free and public sources of mug shots easily found on photo-sharing websites and in motor vehicle department databases, as Science Daily points out, it's easy to imagine a candidate targeting a potential voter with an ad featuring a morphed photo.


"From an ethical standpoint, I'd hope we never see that happen," said Jeremy Bailenson, one of the study's authors, adding that it takes about 15 minutes and $20 to make a morphed photo with a computer. "Candidates spend seven-, eight- or nine-figure budgets on their campaign. So it's not outrageous to think that in a swing state such as Ohio or Pennsylvania, you can have 2,000 people sitting in a room morphing every single citizen in the state. That's a job that's going to take three weeks and not three years."

449px-Masai_ostrich.jpgWith all the news about the Middle East these days, it's easy to assume that nothing much is happening there beyond war, and the tense avoidance of even more war.


But life goes on in Iraq, Iran, and the rest of that troubled region of the globe. Take, for example, the thwarted effort among Iranians to make it into the Guinness Book of World Records by creating the world's longest sandwich.


At 1,500 meters, the super-mega-ultra hoagie was stuffed with 2,205 pounds of ostrich and chicken meat, ostensibly to promote a healthier diet among Iranians. Ostrich meat, in particular, has even less fat than chicken, no cholesterol, and is reportedly quite tasty. I've never had it, but that doesn't mean I wouldn't try it.


Apparently, though, many onlookers had the same idea, but a little prematurely: Before Guinness officials could measure the sub, the crowd dove in and started devouring it, polishing the sandwich off within minutes.


At any rate, it's nice to hear about something other than oil, bombs, and civil unrest for a change.


[Image: Christiaan Kooyman]

jana.jpgOn July 3, 2008, Jana Mackey was killed by her ex-boyfriend, and after the police caught up with the suspect, he killed himself.


That could be a line from any evening newscast, lead in your town's paper, or favorite blog. Instead it summarizes one of the more shocking murders to hit the feminist community. By the age of 25 Jana had helped organize buses for the 2004 March for Women's Lives, had been a lobbyist in the Kansas state legislature and started law school. Her goal was to be a legal advocate for women who found themselves in violent situations. She packed a lot in her short life. Her death was mourned on many blogs by those who did and didn't know her and even spawned a Facebook group.


1,100 people attended Jana's memorial service, and that was included in the name of a new organization that hopes to carry on her work... 1,100 Torches.


1,100 people doing good in the world through service and election work.
1,100 people working towards justice and equality.
1,100 people being motivated by one woman's work.


As Domestic Violence Awareness month comes to a close, 1,100 Torches is preparing for an official kick-off for the campaign and a benefit. The details aren't up yet, but do check the 1,100 Torches website as we get closer to November 13th. If you are in Kansas, please check out the event.

write_to_marry_day_150x125.gifYesterday was designated Write to Marry Day by the blog Mombian. It was a blog action day based on encouraging California voters to vote no on Proposition 8. Prop 8 would overturn the California State Supreme Court's ruling that same-sex couples have the right to marriage and the benefits marriage bestows.


In one day of hot blogging action, almost 400 posts were contributed. And the posts weren't just from the LGBT set. Straight, Not Narrow, a blog advocating for LGBT equality in the body of Christ from a Progressive Christian viewpoint wrote, "If my legal rights to marry, adopt children and avoid discrimination at work were subject to a vote (the infamous "will of the people") every so often, I would be confident that they would be upheld because, as a straight man, those rights are agreed upon by a clear majority of the people. Even then, however, I would have to wonder what kind of justice is really being done if my basic rights were subject to a referendum."


Dawn at This Woman's Work wrote simply, "I want to dance at my child's wedding knowing their rights will be fully respected no matter who they love."


I also participated, as did many of the moms at LA Moms Blog, including Susan who wrote today:


I was walking in the Marina the other day and I saw a bunch of young guys holding "No on Prop 8" signs. One handed me a flyer, a guarded smile on his face. "Can I ask for your support in voting no on Proposition 8?" he asked.


"Of course," I answered, and then, as if we knew each other, "I can't even believe you have to ask me that." But what I meant was that now, in 2008, after Stonewall and Harvey Milk and AIDS and just everything, in this city that I love so much, I simply cannot believe that a young man ten years my junior has to look at me and ask THAT question.


If you have time, scroll through the other posts, especially if you are wavering on which way to vote on Prop 8. Now to wait and see what the people say on Tuesday.

If, during the debates, you thought to yourself, "I've heard all this before," you were right. 23/6, the Huffington Post's comedy channel, breaks it all down for you -- or rather, syncs it all up.



Granted, this is just a couple minutes out of an hour of debate time, but the fact remains that even seemingly off-the-cuff statements by either candidate may be carefully scripted and practiced. Caveat emptor.

They're back, and they're unemployed, depressed, deployed, and injured.


The last we heard from these guys, the economy was on steroids, Bill Clinton was in the White House, and when you heard "Iraq" you probably thought of dates.


Eight years later, let's see what the "Waaaasssuuup!" Budweiser guys have to say now -- or rather, hear how their exuberant frat-boy greeting has devolved into a weak, pathetic whimper.



Now, just for fun, let's take a look at how the guys felt eight years ago.


palinpointing.jpgJohn McCain's campaign has been built on his reputation of being a maverick and bucking the GOP party line. When he brought Sarah Palin on board, she echoed that same maverick line -- she worked across the aisle, stood up against her party, on and on...In their joint interview with Katie Couric, she asked them about a few policy disagreements and McCain replied, "Did you expect two mavericks to agree on -- (laughter) to agree on everything?"


Early in this campaign, in one of the famous Couric interviews, Palin proudly called herself a feminist. She's then since backed off that statement in an interview with Brian Williams, and Bonnie Erbe then questioned Palin's intelligence. But she has at least one very prominent feminist watching her back -- Elaine Lafferty. In an op-ed entitled "Sarah Palin's a Brainiac," Lafferty, a paid consultant for the McCain-Palin campaign and former editor of Ms. Magazine, states that:


It's difficult not to froth when one reads, as I did again and again this week, doubts about Sarah Palin's "intelligence," coming especially from women such as PBS's Bonnie Erbe, who, as near as I recall, has not herself heretofore been burdened with the Susan Sontag of Journalism moniker. As Fred Barnes--God help me, I'm agreeing with Fred Barnes--suggests in the Weekly Standard, these high toned and authoritative dismissals come from people who have never met or spoken with Sarah Palin. Those who know her, love her or hate her, offer no such criticism. They know what I know, and I learned it from spending just a little time traveling on the cramped campaign plane this week: Sarah Palin is very smart.


Lafferty continued to defend her participation in the campaign with, "I'm tired of the Democratic Party taking women for granted. I also happen to believe Sarah Palin supports women's rights, deeply and passionately." The very basic definition of a feminist is someone who supports women's rights. Deeply and passionately is just icing on that definition. If we are to believe the former editor of Ms., the grand dame of feminist publications, that Palin is a feminist or women's rights advocate, one must conclude that Palin is trying to open up the tent on the GOP side as well as cementing the idea of conservative feminism. Of course the definition of who is a feminist is up for debate as well.


Yet changing the culture and appearance of a large organization is a hard thing to do. The idea of feministing the GOP is running into some walls, though, with the recent reports out of the McCain-Palin camp that McCain supporters think she is a diva. She was labeled this for many reasons, including going off script to address ShoppingGate. Again, isn't this what you should expect when dealing with a maverick? Change doesn't happen overnight, of course, but it is hard to watch someone bang their head against a wall, especially in public. Especially when those in her party don't want the change and those outside of her party don't believe she wants the change. Time will tell as I don't believe that Sarah Palin will step back out of the spotlight.


[Image: AP via the Wall Street Journal]

This just in: One week from today, I will neglect to vote and thereby tip the scale in favor of Senator McCain. As anyone who reads this blog knows, I don't support McCain at all.


I don't yet know why I'll fail to vote -- I might forget, or not make it to the polls in time, or maybe I'll just decide my vote doesn't matter since I already live in such a deep-blue state.


But I know the outcome thanks to a CNNBC post-election story, broadcast back in time, about how millions of Americans -- and probably plenty of others around the globe -- want my head because I personally cost Obama the presidency.


You don't believe me? Check out this newscast from the near-future:


OK, you got me. It's a joke, played on my by a friend in Maryland. And it's a joke you can play on your friends, too. What better way to get out the vote than terrifying them into thinking they could individually ruin the whole election?

America starts to resemble Mars more and more everyday. With its partially derailed economy and unrelenting military surges, American government is doing the war god's job for him: wreaking havoc in foreign nations while dissembling its own nation. In which direction will the next president of the United States take America's chariot? Or will he replace the chariot with a podium and a thing called change? The next Frontline reports:


"The next president of the United States will inherit some of the greatest foreign policy challenges in American history -- an overstretched military, frayed alliances and wars on two fronts. FRONTLINE gives viewers a hard, inside look at the real policy choices the next president will face. The report features strategists and diplomats giving their best advice about how to correct past failures and how to shape a realistic foreign policy approach in the Middle East."



Watch Frontline's "The War Briefing" tonight, October 28, from 9 pm to10 pm. ET.


KCP_Logo_2007_sm.jpg

JoshTrevino_image.jpg


I took this shot while following the protests at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota. The father carrying his daughter before the line of riot police is, at first glance, a juxtaposition of brutal power and protective love. Yet having been there, I know there is another interpretation: that the police presence allowed a father and daughter to move safely through the city. The girl is not frightened, and the father's expression is placid. What initially seems a terrible image of oppression and innocence becomes, upon reflection, a vignette of power restrained -- for the sake of that little girl and her father. In our American democracy, it is the latter in whom true power resides.

Politics can be confusing, and the political process is no exception. It's not uncommon to hear a close friend or family member admit, quietly, that he or she doesn't fully "get" the electoral college. Even those of us who studied it in high school, presumably most of the US-born population, might benefit from a refresher course now and then.


But few would ever admit it, opting instead for not-too-blissful ignorance and hoping no one ever gives them a pop quiz about how exactly a presidential candidate gets elected.


That's where Plain English comes in. Offering simple -- dare I say elementary? -- explanations for everything from podcasting to Twitter and social media -- Plain English streams on CommonCraft.com and does a nice job of telling us stuff we feel like we should know without making us feel bad for not knowing it. Best of all, since it's online, you can watch from your desk with your headphones on and no one will ever know.


Apropos of the times, here's Lee LeFever, the host of Plain English, on how a US president gets elected:


volunteermatch.jpgExciting news today as we launch the Kenneth Cole Awearness/ VolunteerMatch partnership.


Several months back, when Kenneth's book, Awearness, started to take shape, we learned that one of the biggest obstacles to volunteering is linking potential volunteers with volunteer opportunities. Our research brought us to VolunteerMatch and their simple, unique approach to this challenge.


Scroll down this page and you will find a widget (Make a Difference!) whereby entering your zip code, dozens of opportunities are generated. Go to the website and you can further your experience by investigating opportunities in specific areas of interest.


We encourage you to check out the new site and take the first step in making a difference.


KCP_Logo_2007_sm.jpg

GreenAmericaLogo.gifAs of January 1st, Co-op America will be known as Green America.


Executive Director Alisa Gravitz said, "After 25 years of leadership in creating the green economy, we feel now is the time to bring the word "green" into our name. As more people embrace "green" we want them to know we are a resource and authority on building authentically green lives and businesses.


Co-op America, soon to be Green America, is a group that does many things to let the public know about how to live a gentler life on this earth. They have a quarterly magazine that has excellent articles -- the Fall 2008 issue features "25 Ways to Green the World" and "25 Years: A Snapshot of Co-Op America Victories." Did you know that in 1986 Co-Op America launched a catalog and that evolved into Seventh Generation? Pretty neat, eh? And people say hippies don't want to make money.


They alert members of actions they can take, places to shop, and even how to be green after you move on from the Earth. It's pretty nice how broad their information is, and mostly without much guilt associated. As Kermit says, it's not easy to be green (without guilt).


Co-op Green America even travels! They hold Green Festivals around the country, with two more happening this year. DC and San Francisco host Green Festivals on Nov. 8 & 9 and Nov. 14-16, respectfully. Denver and Chicago will host festivals in early 2009. At the festivals your badge is just paper, no plastic covering! You also get to roam around and see a zillion ways that you can fix up your house with green materials from paint to concrete. There are also vendors for clothing, toys, and lots and lots of food! It is also super kid-friendly, so you can make a full day of the event.

Twitter is a "micro-blogging" service whose popularity has exploded this year. What is it? According to Wikipedia,


Twitter is a free social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read other users' updates (otherwise known as tweets), which are text-based posts of up to 140 characters in length.


Updates are displayed on the user's profile page and delivered to other users who have signed up to receive them. The sender can restrict delivery to those in his or her circle of friends (delivery to everyone being the default). Users can receive updates via the Twitter website, instant messaging, SMS, RSS, email or through an application such as Twitterrific or Facebook.


If you haven't used it, think of it as sort of like the "status update" in Facebook, but with all your friends' statuses showing up right alongside your own, creating a sort of low-grade chat environment. It's a great way to keep up with your favorite people and websites, and share interesting stuff. As a freelance writer, I use it as a stand-in for the over-the-cubicle banter that office-folk engage in all day.


awearnesstwitter.pngIt has also served as a potent check of the political barometer. So many people were tweeting about politics that Twitter created an Election 2008 channel where members' comments about the presidential campaign, the debates and other political issues are displayed on a constantly updating page.


So, we've joined the twittering masses. You can now follow AWEARNESS Blog on Twitter, too, so you'll get an alert when news posts appear -- and you can share your thoughts and interact with us in a new way. We look forward to hearing what you have to say!

If Governor Palin talked about something other than her wardrobe at a rally yesterday in Tampa, Florida, it won't make much difference. The second she brought it up, that issue alone will be the one we hear about, ensuring, as Jonathan Martin on Politico suggests, "one more news cycle" for the controversy surrounding the Palin family's six-figure campaign closet.


Palin seized the opportunity to address the GOP crowd "without the filter of the media," as she put it, in an overtly mocking tone.


Seriously, media! Give her a break, why don't you? Isn't there a nicer way you can phrase, "It just undercuts Palin's whole image as a hockey mom, a 'one-of-us' kind of candidate"?


Oops. That line, which appeared in last Thursday's New York Times, was actually a quote from Ed Rollins, who ran Ronald Reagan's re-election campaign in 1984.


But OK, maybe the media has been a little unfair. After all, Senator Obama's suits certainly aren't cheap, and neither are John McCain's or Joe Biden's. Perhaps it is a double-standard to attack Palin and co. for wanting to look their best while they're on the campaign trail. It would get tiresome seeing Todd suited up for the next arctic NASCAR event.


greenspan.jpgIt was the comment heard round the world. There was a time when every utterance of Alan Greenspan, who was the longest serving Federal Reserve Chairman in American history, could move markets. Young bankers hung on his every passing remark, his"Greenspeak." He was regarded as a "rock star of economics." Greenspan's book signings drew crowds and paparazzi.


But on Thursday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Greenspan, the foremost champion of unregulated markets, shrugged. This week's exchange between Greenspan and Henry Waxman, a California Democrat Committee Chairman, is breathtaking:


Congressman Henry Waxman: Do you feel that your ideology pushed you to make decisions that you wish you had not made?


Alan Greenspan: Well, remember that what an ideology is, is a conceptual framework with the way people deal with reality. Everyone has one. You have to -- to exist, you need an ideology.


Waxman: The question is whether it is accurate or not.


Greenspan: And what I'm saying to you is, yes, I've found a flaw. I don't know how significant or permanent it is. But I've been very distressed by that fact. But if I may, may I just answer the question --


Waxman: You found a flaw in the reality --


Greenspan: Flaw in the model that I perceived as the critical functioning structure that defines how the world works, so to speak."


Greenspan, to be sure, must be given kudos for his astonishing honesty. The politic thing for him to do would have been to obfuscate and spin. For a man of his advanced years to admit to so grave an error before the all the world in this moment of exigency should not be taken lightly. Still, as we move deeper into the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, it is bittersweet consolation that it might have been caused, in large part, by a philosophical mistake by a former economic rock star.


[Image: Biggerpockets]

safebabysite.jpgI have to admit that I chuckled when I first read that Nebraska's Safe Haven law was written so vaguely that a teenager could be left at a hospital. Safe Haven laws are "laws that decriminalize leaving unharmed infants with statutorily designated private persons so that the child becomes a ward of the state." The laws came about to battle baby dumping -- when someone just leaves an infant on a door step, in the bushes or a garbage pile after they decide they don't want or can't parent. So it was a bit shocking to hear that Nebraska was going to allow children up to 18 to be left at Safe Haven spots. My immediate thought was, "Good thing I didn't grow up in Nebraska!"


I was sadly too close to what was about to happen. Story after story has captured headlines of a parent of a teenager who has just had it with them and used the Safe Haven law. One of the saddest stories is of Gary Staton, who left nine of his 10 children at a medical center. "Staton said he surrendered the children because he was overwhelmed with the responsibility of caring for them since his wife ... died early last year."


Apparently the media attention has gotten the attention of the Nebraska governor and the legislature and they plan to revisit the age limits when they return to duty in January. Unfortunately, they are talking of reducing the age to three days old. That seems far too short of a window for a woman to decide if she wanted to parent or not. Heck, a woman who gave birth via cesarean most likely is still in the hospital on day three.


But the down right saddest story to come out of Nebraska is one of a 16-year-old girl who asked for the law to be used to help her:


The girl, who was escorted by an aunt last week to Immanuel Medical Center in Omaha, told a social worker that she was kicked out of her mother's home, according to court documents filed in Douglas County Juvenile Court. She also said that she had been emotionally abused and suffered physical harm.


Court records indicate that the teen's mother would likely be charged with criminal child neglect, though Omaha police said Thursday that no charge had been filed. The teen and her 10-month-old son have been placed in foster care.


Media reports fail to say if the revised Safe Haven Law will address parents kicking children out of their homes as abuse and if those parents will be charged.

If you've been trying to shield your kid from the election, I bet that it's a huge failure at this point. With candidate ads running almost non-stop here in Illinois for local candidates, it must be almost impossible for Toyota to run an ad in Ohio. So what's a parent or super cool aunt/uncle to tell the kid about the election?


First, you could whip out a few books. Cookie magazine gives us a nice starter list. There's also:


takedaughterpoll.jpg Then you can take your kid to the polls when you vote. Yes, yes, the campaign is focused on daughters, but just like Take Your Daughters to Work Day, evolve it to your sons, too. And again, super cool aunts and uncles can participate! Borrow the kid, give their parents a break while you two stand in line to cast your vote for president.


Some might ask why we should even talk to our kids about the election, especially as it turns super ugly. For one thing, kids are watching and forming their own opinions. Gender Public Advocacy Coalition released a study on what children think of candidates:


A new study has found that one in four children thought it was illegal for women and minorities to hold the office of president, while one in three attributed the lack of female, African-American and Latino presidents to voter's racial and gender bias.


Yes, you read that correctly. Kids think it is illegal for women and minorities to be president. So much for inspiring children to shoot for the stars.


That startling study should encourage us all to talk to the kids in our lives about the election, no matter who you are supporting. They are watching, listening and making their own decisions. Do you really want the little Latina girl in your life thinking it's illegal for her to be president?


[image: The White House Project]

Thumbnail image for Hanson brothers_bryant park-1.jpgRemember Hanson? Here's a clue: MmmBop.


That's right, the three brothers from Tulsa, Oklahoma who exploded onto the music scene in 1997, when they were mere lads, with a pop song so catchy that now, after 11 years, I can still remember it as well as my own phone number.


If you're not a teenage girl, nor were you one in the late Nineties, you might think Hanson simply evaporated like so many teen sensations do after their 15 minutes of fame have passed.


But you'd be wrong. They may have grown up, but they aren't retired. In July, 2007, the three Hanson brothers -- Isaac, Taylor, and Zac -- released a new studio album, The Walk, and with it, they launched a concerted effort to raise awareness and funds to curb poverty and HIV/AIDS in Africa. Now in its second year, "Take The Walk" has traveled around the world.


Prior to each concert of the tour, which began in September last year, the Hansons lead their fans on a mile-long walk -- shoes are optional. For each person who walks, the band donates one dollar to improving the quality of life in Africa, from drilling wells to building hospitals and feeding people. This fall alone, Taylor Hanson says between the band's own pre-concert walks and those organized independently, about 9,000 miles of pavement have been traversed. And as you know, that kind of cash can go pretty far in an impoverished continent.


Thumbnail image for Z_barefoot with bull horn-1.JPGTaylor Hanson, of the longish blond hair and boyish looks, both of which have caused more than a few girls to swoon, says the idea began around 2006, when he and his brothers went to Africa for the first time. Inspired by a company in their hometown that uses cell phones and the Web to connect doctors and patients, Docvia, they realized the same idea could be of tremendous use in Africa.


"We have to start using what we have," Taylor says. "The needs are there, especially with AIDS, but also with poverty and the children who are struggling with those issues. And with technology the way it is now, there are so many ways for us to go direct, to go one-on-one."


While The Walk may be relatively new, Taylor says he and his brothers have long supported charitable causes. "It's hard for me, when I see things clearly, not to act on it," he says, adding that Hanson's popularity as a band could be used as leverage. "We realized that we could speak honestly and not just be a bunch of talking heads."


The walks have grown in number, from just 100 fans or so at first, to as many as a thousand in cities like Chicago and Los Angeles. On Monday, Hanson led a walk through Midtown before the band's concert at the Nokia Theater in Times Square, and many more are scheduled this fall.


Lest you think that Hanson isn't really behind this, but rather a boardroom full of suits scheming new ways to make money and using the three brothers as pawns, this is the real deal. Now fully independent -- Hanson even has its own label -- the brothers are sincere, and this effort is truly grassroots.


As Taylor sees it, small, community-based efforts is the way to get things done now, and to do it with high-technology. "We're trying to activate individuals," he says. "There's no reason the Facebook world can't help create positive change."


[Images: Hanson addressing the fans pre-walk in Bryant Park (top); Taylor Hanson's barefoot march through Midtown (bottom), both courtesy of the band.]

080519-mccain-vmed-1p_widec.jpgHow much medical history are we, as Americans, entitled to have on our leaders? It is a difficult question, one that straddles the line of privacy. Clearly, voters should know upfront if a prospective president or vice president has a serious medical issue that may affect his or her ability to govern. Would we have elected John F. Kennedy president if we had known that he suffered from Addison's Disease? Did Americans have a right to know about FDR's polio?


Senator Joe Biden, the running mate of Democratic Party nominee Barack Obama, released his medical records this week. Twenty years ago the Delaware senator was operated on for potentially life-threatening aneurysms . In the 49 pages of medical documents released on Monday, Biden was essentially given a clean bill of health. Of the four candidates running for national office in 2008, Biden has released the most detailed medical information.


The other candidates have not, in varying degrees, been nearly as forthcoming as Biden on the state of their medical health. Governor Palin, for example, has released no medical information and, further, will not be interviewed on the subject. Senator Obama, by contrast, released a one page letter -- 276 words -- from his personal doctor Dr. David L. Scheiner, saying, in part, that the candidate was in "excellent health." Is that enough information, though, for voters gearing for the most important election of our lives?


In an October 20th editorial, The New York Times wrote:

The big gaps in what the nominees have been willing to make public were described in The Times on Monday by Lawrence K. Altman, a medical reporter who is also a physician. Senator John McCain has put out far more information than his rival, but under such restricted conditions that it is impossible to nail down the truth about his past melanomas, the most dangerous form of skin cancer. Senator Barack Obama has put out such meager information that voters have to take it largely on his campaign's say-so that he is in good health.


McCain's medical history and future is perhaps the biggest question mark hanging over the question of the health of the candidates. In 1999, during his first run for the presidency, McCain released an astonishing 1,500 pages of medical documents. This time around, in May, McCain released 1,200 pages of medical information. And this time there were conditions for the press review. His doctors at the Mayo Clinic would only answer questions for 45 minutes by telephone. The records could not be photocopied. And the reporters allowed to view the documents were few. CNN's medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta, one of the handful of journalists allowed to see the records, told The Huffington Post "It was very sort of cloak and dagger and I'm sure they had their reasons. Given that I had my medical training, I was able to hone in on what it thought was important more quickly. But the pages weren't numbered, so I had no way of knowing what was missing... As a reporter I can only comment on what I saw but I can't say by any means that this was complete."


Senator McCain, if elected, would be the oldest person ever inaugurated as President of the United States. In 2000 McCain underwent Stage IIa melanoma surgery. That was eight years ago, and the 10-year survival rate for Stage IIa melanoma is around 66 percent. Do voters have a right to have the full story with McCain, or, for that matter, with Senator Obama and Governor Palin?


[Image: MSNBC]

aidwalkphilly.jpg


One of the reasons I decided to accept a position at Kenneth Cole Productions was my interest in the community service and philanthropic work that the company is so involved with.


This past weekend, Oct. 19, I attended an AIDS Walk in Philadelphia to get myself more involved in Kenneth Cole's community spirit while taking part in something far bigger than the company itself.


Having never participated in an AIDS walk, I was not fully prepared for the amount of people that walked for the cause -- as well as how long 8.4 miles really is! Yet what was most inspiring about the walk was that, while it consisted of hundreds of thousands of people, it truly was a bonding experience for everyone involved. I walked with members of our Philadelphia, Franklin Mills and Atlantic City stores and immediately connected with them by doing such an event together. Furthermore, I felt that same connection to all the walkers, as we trekked along, by just knowing that we were all there for the same reason. It is that bond that made me feel that in unity, something can be done to fight against the AIDS epidemic.


As one person, I often feel the challenge in really making a difference by myself; but as one person in an AIDS walk, I felt like we could change the world. It is inspiring to truly feel that as one person, I can make a difference.