Should he shouldn't he? That's the question people are asking about the presumptive Democratic nominee for President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Should he pick her as his running mate for the upcoming election? Strategically, it seems like a good idea. If Obama is going to defeat John McCain, it makes sense to combine forces with his once formidable opponent. Not only will she surely bring many of her supporters with her, she can also stand up to the Republican attack dogs who will come after him with both barrels firing.


Others have opined that he would need a food taster if she were to be second in command at the White House. That Michele Obama can't stand her. That Bill Clinton comes along with the package - and can Obama afford to have such a loose cannon around. We know that Hillary Clinton has suggested that she is staying in the race because anything can happen - like an assassination a la Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Is that her reason for wanting to be Vice President as well. And, if so, does that disqualify her from the job?


Whatever his choice, he must not be afraid to go negative. McCain will paint a picture of an inexperienced candidate whose election will be an unmitigated disaster. But the subtext of the conversation will be about race, about Muslim sympathizers, about everything but the issues. Is Hillary the strongest candidate to deflect these arguments against Obama?


Amid Obama's triumphant moment, Clinton missed her chance to reach out and congratulate the first African American to be nominated for the nation's highest office. The TV pundits are saying that Obama's people are incensed by her lack of grace and refusal to tip her hat to Obama on his historic triumph. Perhaps she blew what chance she had to be number two. Time will tell. The arguments are persuasive on both sides. It will be Obama's most important decision in the coming months.

Comments (4)

If Clinton would like the number two spot, there is little doubt she could have it, with or without Obama's blessing. If she decides to take it to the floor of the convention, with the story of an unbeatable unity ticket, I believe virtually all of her delegates would vote for her and a large number of Obama's superdelegates would as well. These party leaders agonized over telling the Clintons they would not support her for president. Most of them would not have to stomach to do it again at the VP level. Obviously it would be better for all concerned if Obama and Clinton reached agreement on the subject, but Clinton has some pretty good cards in her hand, should she choose to play them.

The more interesting question is: How can Hillary be an effective VP? Certainly she could be a terrific VP CANDIDATE, playing the traditional role of pit bull as VP candidates often do, and she should be able to solidify votes for the ticket. Once elected, however, the Clintons would have an unprecedented profile for the office of VP. I would secretly love to see an arrangement where Hillary becomes the VP candidate and Bill is considered to replace her in the Senate. It would give him a great new role and keep him out of the Executive Branch, where he could be problematic (if his conduct during the primaries is any indication). I am not sure whether he would be interested in the Senate spot but it would certainly make the whole arrangement much more palatable to all concerned and probably be the best thing for the country.


Hi -- Thanks for your thoughtful response.

I really love the idea of Bill filling in for Hillary in the Senate, though I don't know the technicalities of the procedure.

Evenso, Hillary would be a handful.

And can the convention really pick Hillary without Obama's approval?

Senator Hillary Clinton replaced by Senator Bill Clinton?

BRILLIANT. Brilliant idea.

In the event that Hillary were to be elected VP, she would need to resign from her Senate seat. It would then be up to David Patterson, the new governor of New York, to fill the vacancy. So he would have to be involved in the deal to put Bill in the seat. Given the array of powers that would be lined up for such a deal -- Obama, the Clintons, Howard Dean and the DNC, lots of institutional support from the state party, etc. -- I would have to believe Patterson would do it if asked.


As for a floor fight between Obama and Clinton if they do not reach agreement on the VP spot, it would be yet another unprecedented move in a year filled with them. Technically, the delegates choose the presidential nominee, the presidential nominee selects a VP nominee, and the convention then ratifies the selection. Since we have not had a floor fight in decades, it is a bit unclear exactly how the issue would be resolved (I would have to check the latest rules). In any event, it would be a royal mess.

Post a comment