I warn you now, this article will be bitter and more superficial than most of the other entries on this blog. Why? Because I literally have a bitter taste in my mouth caused by a street sweeping machine.

These miracles of modern engineering are designed to scrub, wash, brush and vacuum the dirt from our streets to make our gutters sparkle like your grandmother's best china. They're like the Swiss Army Knife of cleaning machines. However, on closer inspection, these machines have another cleaning device in their repertoire: pedestrians.


Yes, that's right, we're all being unwittingly used and abused by these cunning contraptions. As they pass the average, unsuspecting, freshly showered, nicely pressed, coffee carrying, person on their way to work, the aggressive brushes whip up all of the dirt and grime from the road and unsociably hurl it in our direction. The disgusting dust and debris (from who knows what) is then gently deposited in our eyes, in our hair, on our clothes, up our nostrils, between our molars, and finally settle down in a warm soothing lung, or two. When you think about it, we, the worker bees, are actually collecting this pollen of poop and kindly distributing it around the city.


Now call me old fashioned, but if I had the choice to: a) eat the crap from the gutter; or b) leave the crap in the gutter, I'm unsurprisingly leaning towards option b). It's a shame I don't actually get a choice.


Apparently, there are 450 street sweeper machines in New York that sweep 47,400 scheduled routes covering 6,000 miles of roads. That's the equivalent of sweeping from New York to Los Angeles and back again, on a daily basis.


This is obviously quite remarkable, but when you think that NYC's population swells to over 15 million people on any given work day, these unscrupulous scrubbing vehicles have quite a hefty workforce to do their dirty work for them.


Surely someone out there can redesign these machines to make them less offensive to the tax paying public? What about Sir James Dyson, the sultan of suction, perhaps he could give it a go?


Well, I'd better go now, my dog s**t sandwich is getting cold... it's an acquired taste you know.


KCP_Logo_2007_sm.jpg

Comments (5)

Hi! Thanks for crediting my photo, but I think you may have changed your mind about which photo to use. I didn't take the one in your post.

I appreciate the credit, but this one's not mine! :)

Just like a car heading towards a puddle I am standing by, I move away from the street sweeper if it is getting close to me.

If you think the sweeper is bad, think of New York with the street filled with everything we discard.

This is the worse article I have ever read.

Hi Pat, thanks for your comment. I also move away from the street sweepers but if you stand back and watch, it's astonishing how much dirt and dust is thrown up into the air for pedestrians to walk through. I am not suggesting that we stop picking up the litter or cleaning up the daily grime, I just wondered if there's a way of redesigning these machines so it contains more of the dirt and doesn't spread it in the direction of the sidewalk.

Even so called "non-toxic" particulate can be dangerous to your health. Here in Tennessee there is much blasting due to urban sprawl. The particulate has been very uncomfortable to breath let alone the long term health concerns. This is a by-product of our still healthy economy here in the south.

Hey Steve

I'm a newbie on the site and have got to thank you for opening my eyes to the issue...who'd have thought that even the street sweepers would have an agenda? Makes me more convinced about my own theory about the steam coming out of the manholes. We unsuspecting pedestrians breathe in the gas, ingest, go about our daily grind, return to the 'burbs and, well, excrete...hey presto, Bloomberg gets to keep his promises about reducing carbon dioxide in the city and guess who suffers? The average Joe from outta town!

I'm in town this weekend if you'd like to discuss?

Simon

Post a comment