What began as a simple protest by Tibetans against their Chinese occupiers has escalated into a small war and a full-fledged international cause celebre that threatens to undermine the Olympics and may lead to boycotts by Western nations. When Republican presidential nominee John McCain was asked about the situation on a stopover in France (part of his world "fact-finding tour" on the taxpayer's dime), he was quick to express his disfavor of the Chinese government's behavior. One should not be surprised to see the Tibet-China conflict and the Olympics become a hot button topic in the Clinton-Obama race as well.


Events are further complicated by the route of the Olympic torch, which is set to pass through Tibet on its way to Beijing. French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Tuesday that he cannot rule out the possibility he might boycott the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics if China continues its crackdown in Tibet:


"An official from France's state television company said the broadcaster would likely boycott the games if coverage was censored, and the European Union, United States, Australia and Canada urged China to show restraint as it tries to quell continuing unrest in its Tibetan areas."

Further weight is given to the protest in an open letter by intellectuals and world leaders led by Vaclav Havel, the former president of the Czech Republic. (Read the letter at the jump. Thanks to my Facebook friend for passing it along.) Comparing China's reaction to the protests (which has led to nearly 200 deaths) to Communism during the days of the Iron Curtain, it contains this chilling paragraph:


"The reaction of the Chinese authorities to the Tibetan protests evokes echoes of the totalitarian practices that many of us remember from the days before Communism in Central and Eastern Europe collapsed in 1989: Harsh censorship of the domestic media, blackouts of reporting by foreign media from China, refusal of visas to foreign journalists, and blaming the unrest on the "Dalai Lama's conspiratorial clique" and other unspecified dark forces supposedly manipulated from abroad."

As the call for some form of boycott grows, arguments proposed by sponsors Samsung, Coca Cola and others advocating keeping politics out of the Olympic games become harder to make. Slate's Anne Applebaum does an excellent job of debunking those arguments while suggesting that a boycott may actually be a very good idea.


Thoughts?


The video is from a news report on a campaign by Reporters Without Borders to enlist celebrities to wear t-shirts that depict the Olympic logo as handcuffs.


"Tibet's Peace is the Peace of the Graveyard"


- Vaclav Havel, Andri Glucksmann, Yohei Sasakawa, El Hassan Bin Talal, F.W. de Klerk, Karel Schwarzenberg


The recent events in Tibet and adjoining provinces are causes for deep concern. Indeed, the dispersal of a peaceful protest march organized by Tibetan monks, which led to a wave of unrest that was brutally suppressed by the Chinese military and police, has caused indignation all over the democratic world.


The reaction of the Chinese authorities to the Tibetan protests evokes echoes of the totalitarian practices that many of us remember from the days before Communism in Central and Eastern Europe collapsed in 1989: Harsh censorship of the domestic media, blackouts of reporting by foreign media from China, refusal of visas to foreign journalists, and blaming the unrest on the "Dalai Lama's conspiratorial clique" and other unspecified dark forces supposedly manipulated from abroad.


Indeed, the language used by some Chinese government representatives and the official Chinese media is a reminder of the worst of times during the Stalinist and Maoist eras.


But the most dangerous development of this unfortunate situation is the current attempt to seal off Tibet from the rest of the world.


Even as we write, it is clear that China's rulers are trying to reassure the world that peace, quiet, and "harmony" have again prevailed in Tibet. We all know this kind of peace from what has happened in the past in Myanmar, Cuba, Belarus and a few other countries -- it is called the peace of the graveyard.


Merely urging the Chinese government to exercise the "utmost restraint" in dealing with the Tibetan people, as governments around the world are doing, is far too weak a response.


The international community, beginning with the UN and followed by the EU, ASEAN and other international organizations, as well as individual countries, should use every means possible to step up pressure on the Chinese government to do the following:


* Allow foreign media, as well as international fact-finding missions, into Tibet and adjoining provinces in order to enable objective investigations of what has been happening.


* Release all those who only peacefully exercised their internationally guaranteed human rights, and guarantee that no one is subjected to torture and unfair trials.


* Enter into a meaningful dialogue with the representatives of the Tibetan people.


Unless these conditions are fulfilled, the International Olympic Committee should seriously reconsider whether holding this summer's Olympic Games in a country that includes a peaceful graveyard remains a good idea.


Vaclav Havel is a former president of the Czech Republic, Andri Glucksmann is a French philosopher, Yohei Sasakawa is a Japanese philanthropist, El Hassan Bin Talal is president of the Arab Thought Forum and president emeritus of the World Conference of Religions for Peace, F.W. de Klerk is a former president of South Africa, and Karel Schwarzenberg is foreign minister of the Czech Republic.

Comments (2)

Thanks so much for posting this article! It makes me feel ill to see that the greed for power is what it takes to end countless lives and inflict untold human suffering. The genocide in Darfur has also been connected to this Olympics in China issue. Being born of Chinese descent; conflicts like these makes me feel somewhat disgraced.

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-03/19/content_7822837.htm

Hu Jintao'mob did them,many Chinese think.

Post a comment